The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

MiMo-V2-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 35.4 to 29.9.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.4 to 29.9, ranking #103 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.4 and ranks #103 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.4
#103
29.9
#142
Reasoning
37.5
#84
29.2
#143
Coding
25.3
#85
14.8
#151
Agents
16.8
#97
12.4
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Tool use
18.4#80
5.6#168
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for MiMo-V2-Pro · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

1 shared

MiMo-V2-Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (PinchBench).

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

926.0B diff

MiMo-V2-Pro has 926.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 1251.4% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
1000.0B
MiMo-V2-Pro
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Pro specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Pro does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2-Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 7 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

7 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

2 days ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2-Pro

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 35.4 to 29.9. MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2-Pro compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.4 vs 29.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons