Model Comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.7-PlusWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 1.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.7-Plus — which is better?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro (by Xiaomi) and Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 7 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0). Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

MiMo-V2.5-Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (Claw-Eval, Finance Agent v2, GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 7 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7-Plus is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.7-Plus's 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Jul 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.7-Plus uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Qwen3.7-Plus is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

3 months ago

Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher Claw-Eval score (64.0% vs 62.7%)
Higher Finance Agent v2 score (41.5% vs 38.2%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (42.9% vs 31.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (78.9% vs 77.7%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7-Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (90.3% vs 66.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (34.7% vs 34.0%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (89.6% vs 39.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (88.5% vs 68.5%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (94.5% vs 92.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (57.6% vs 57.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (70.3% vs 68.4%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro cheaper than Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.43 vs $0.32/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.7-Plus?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons