The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

MiMo-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.9.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.9, ranking #100 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.9 and ranks #100 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.9
#100
29.9
#142
Reasoning
35.5
#97
29.2
#143
Coding
28.8
#69
14.8
#151
Agents
21.1
#79
12.4
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiMo-V2.5 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

236.8B diff

MiMo-V2.5 has 236.8B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 320.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
310.8Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
310.8B
MiMo-V2.5
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

6 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiMo-V2.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.5

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.9. MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.5 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.9 vs 29.9), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons