The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiMo-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 22.1.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 22.1, ranking #100 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.9 and ranks #100 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.9
#100
22.1
#202
Reasoning
35.5
#97
19.8
#213
Coding
28.8
#68
2.9
#241
Agents
21.1
#79
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiMo-V2.5 · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

306.8B diff

MiMo-V2.5 has 306.8B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 7669.4% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
310.8Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
310.8B
MiMo-V2.5
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

MiMo-V2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

6 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 22.1. MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.5 compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.9 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons