The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M1 40K vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 20.0.

MiniMax · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 20.0, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M1 40K

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M1 40K
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
20.0
#220
48.7
#29
Reasoning
20.2
#210
45.9
#32
Coding
7.7
#205
37.9
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiniMax M1 40K
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Tool use
12.7#120
27.1#27
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiniMax M1 40K · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M1 40K and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 40K does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M1 40K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M1 40K is licensed under MIT, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 16 months newer than MiniMax M1 40K.

MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

3 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M1 40K and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M1 40K
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M1 40K vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, MiniMax M1 40K or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 20.0. MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M1 40K compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M1 40K and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M1 40K supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M1 40K and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (20.0 vs 48.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons