MiniMax M1 80K vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 20.9.
MiniMax · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 20.9, ranking #146 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiniMax M1 80K
- you want predictable pricing at $0.55/M input and $2.20/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.6 and ranks #146 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for MiniMax M1 80K · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
MiniMax M1 80K outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiniMax M1 80K has 382.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 516.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies output context (40,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 80K does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiniMax M1 80K
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiniMax M1 80K is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 16 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Jun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
1.3yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiniMax M1 80K's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M1 80K's cutoff date.
—
May 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiniMax M1 80K and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiniMax M1 80K vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More MiniMax M1 80K comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open