The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

MiniMax M1 80K leads the LLM Stats Score 21.4 to 5.8.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M1 80K leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.4 to 5.8, ranking #191 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M1 80K wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M1 80K

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.4 and ranks #191 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen2 72B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
21.4
#191
5.8
#297
21.6
#180
5.7
#293
9.5
#174
9.8
#171
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.55 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiniMax M1 80K
Qwen2 72B Instruct
19.6#165
11.0#246
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiniMax M1 80K · 17 for Qwen2 72B Instruct

2 shared

MiniMax M1 80K outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2 72B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiniMax M1 80K significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

384.0B diff

MiniMax M1 80K has 384.0B more parameters than Qwen2 72B Instruct, making it 533.3% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M1 80K
456.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
456.0B
MiniMax M1 80K
72.0B
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies output context (40,000 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M1 80K
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output40,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M1 80K is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M1 80K

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16, while Qwen2 72B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

MiniMax M1 80K is 11 months newer than Qwen2 72B Instruct.

MiniMax M1 80K

Jun 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

10mo newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M1 80K
✓ Preferred
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M1 80K vs Qwen2 72B Instruct.

Which is better, MiniMax M1 80K or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

MiniMax M1 80K leads the LLM Stats Score 21.4 to 5.8. MiniMax M1 80K is made by MiniMax and Qwen2 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M1 80K compare to Qwen2 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

MiniMax M1 80K scores MATH-500: 96.8%, ZebraLogic: 86.8%, AIME 2024: 86.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.1%, AIME 2025: 76.9%. Qwen2 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.1%, CMMLU: 90.1%, HellaSwag: 87.6%, HumanEval: 86.0%, Winogrande: 85.1%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

MiniMax M1 80K supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2 72B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.4 vs 5.8), licensing (MIT vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M1 80K and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

MiniMax M1 80K is developed by MiniMax and Qwen2 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.