MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) are closely matched at 26.4 and 29.6 on the LLM Stats Score.
MiniMax · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 26.4 and 29.6.
In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiniMax M2
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for MiniMax M2 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
MiniMax M2 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SciCode).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiniMax M2 has 156.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 210.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only MiniMax M2 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M2 specifies output context (1,000,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2 does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiniMax M2
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiniMax M2 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniMax M2 was released on 2025-10-27, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 12 months newer than MiniMax M2.
Oct 27, 2025
12 months ago
Oct 15, 2026
1 weeks ago
11mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiniMax M2's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M2's cutoff date.
—
May 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiniMax M2 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More MiniMax M2 comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open