The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder are closely matched at 48.5 and 49.7 on the LLM Stats Score. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 30.5x cheaper per token.

MiniMax · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 49.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 30.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 30.5x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Muse Wonder

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#29
49.7
#22
Reasoning
45.8
#34
42.4
#57
Coding
37.8
#23
39.5
#12
Agents
35.6
#23
37.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.15 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Muse Wonder
Vision
28.8#42
26.6#52
Tool use
26.8#30
22.4#54
Multimodal
30.2#38
26.6#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 18 for Muse Wonder

3 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder is better at 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, GDP.pdf, Terminal-Bench 4.0).

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 26.7x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 33.3x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Muse Wonder.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

-2 days ago

1w newer
Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Muse Wonder?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 49.7. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash cheaper than Muse Wonder?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 26.7x cheaper for input tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 49.7), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.15 vs $4.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons