The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder Full

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched at 48.5 and 53.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

MiniMax · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 53.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder Full wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#29
53.1
#11
Reasoning
45.8
#34
45.6
#35
Coding
37.8
#23
42.4
#7
Agents
35.6
#23
40.9
#5
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Muse Wonder Full
Vision
28.8#42
31.4#30
Tool use
26.8#30
27.3#26
Multimodal
30.2#38
31.4#30
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 18 for Muse Wonder Full

3 shared

MiniMax M3.1 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder Full is better at 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, GDP.pdf, Terminal-Bench 4.0).

Muse Wonder Full significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Muse Wonder Full.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

-2 days ago

1w newer
Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Muse Wonder Full?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 53.1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 53.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Muse Wonder Full?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons