The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 14.0.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 14.0, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#29
14.0
#261
Reasoning
45.8
#34
11.3
#276
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Vision
28.8#42
10.5#137
Multimodal
30.2#38
11.4#129
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 15 for Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct was released on 2024-08-29.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 26 months newer than Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

-2 days ago

2.1yr newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Aug 29, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-06-30, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct's training data extends to 2023-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Jun 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 14.0. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.5%, VCR_en_easy: 91.9%, ChartQA: 88.3%, OCRBench: 87.7%, MMBench: 86.5%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 14.0), licensing (Proprietary vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons