MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Max
MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 21.3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 6.2x cheaper per token.
MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 21.3, ranking #29 overall.
On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 6.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 6.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Qwen3 Max
- you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
15 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 6 for Qwen3 Max
MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3 Maxdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 Max is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 Max's 256,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Qwen3 Max is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 Max does not.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen3 Max
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than Qwen3 Max.
Oct 19, 2026
6 days ago
10mo newerDec 15, 2025
10 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen3 Max
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Max.