The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Sarvam-105B

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched at 26.9 and 25.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 26.9 and 25.7.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5

  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
26.9
#153
25.7
#162
27.2
#145
26.1
#156
23.7
#82
-1.6
#256
8.9
#138
5.5
#153
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$7.50 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Mistral Medium 3.5
Sarvam-105B
18.9#173
29.1#90
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Mistral Medium 3.5 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

4 shared

Mistral Medium 3.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Sarvam-105B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Beyond AIME, BrowseComp).

Sarvam-105B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.0B diff

Mistral Medium 3.5 has 23.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 21.9% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
128.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
128.0B
Mistral Medium 3.5
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Medium 3.5 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Mistral Medium 3.5 specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3.5
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Medium 3.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Sarvam-105B does not.

Mistral Medium 3.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mistral Medium 3.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Sarvam-105B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Mistral Medium 3.5 is licensed under Modified MIT License, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Mistral Medium 3.5

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Medium 3.5 was released on 2026-04-29, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is 2 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

Mistral Medium 3.5

Apr 29, 2026

5 months ago

1mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Medium 3.5
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Sarvam-105B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 26.9 and 25.7. Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mistral Medium 3.5 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores COLLIE: 95.8%, Tau3 Telecom: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 86.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.6%, Tau3 Retail: 76.1%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.9 vs 25.7), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Modified MIT License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral Medium 3.5 and Sarvam-105B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is developed by Mistral AI and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.