The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Sarvam-105B

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.8.

Baidu · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.8, ranking #13 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Sarvam-105B
Sarvam AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
24.8
#200
Reasoning
50.7
#12
25.3
#191
Coding
37.9
#20
-2.0
#291
Agents
38.5
#11
3.9
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 14 for Sarvam-105B

1 shared

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while Sarvam-105B is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

175.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 175.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 166.7% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 8 months newer than Sarvam-105B.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

8mo newer
Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Sarvam-105B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 24.8. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Sarvam-105B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 24.8), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Sarvam-105B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.

Related comparisons