The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched at -4.8 and -3.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -4.8 and -3.2.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral NeMo Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-4.8
#369
-3.2
#359
-5.0
#361
-3.2
#351
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.03 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
-8.1#224
-5.9#220
-8.1#210
-7.2#207
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Mistral NeMo Instruct · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

4 shared

Mistral NeMo Instruct outperforms in 3 benchmarks (HellaSwag, MMLU, Winogrande), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (TruthfulQA).

Mistral NeMo Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

Mistral NeMo Instruct has 5.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 71.4% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is 2 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.2 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral NeMo Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Mistral NeMo Instruct or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -4.8 and -3.2. Mistral NeMo Instruct is made by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mistral NeMo Instruct compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.8 vs -3.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral NeMo Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.