The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Ember vs Nova Micro

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 1.9. Nova Micro is 3.5x cheaper per token.

Meta · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 1.9, ranking #47 overall.

On price, Nova Micro is roughly 3.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Nova Micro

  • cost matters — it's about 3.5x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Ember
Meta
Nova Micro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.9
#47
1.9
#361
Reasoning
48.1
#24
1.1
#355
Coding
27.3
#86
2.5
#265
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.03 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Muse Ember · 17 for Nova Micro

No common benchmarks found

Muse Ember and Nova Microdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Micro costs less

For input processing, Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Ember is more expensive than Nova Micro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Ember
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerMeta
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input tokens$0.03
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Nova Micro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Ember supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.

Muse Ember can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Micro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Muse Ember is 24 months newer than Nova Micro.

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

2.0yr newer
Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API. Nova Micro is available from Bedrock.

Muse Ember

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Nova Micro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Ember and Nova Micro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Ember
✓ Preferred
Nova Micro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Ember vs Nova Micro.

Which is better, Muse Ember or Nova Micro?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 1.9. Muse Ember is made by Meta and Nova Micro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Ember compare to Nova Micro in benchmarks?

Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.

Is Muse Ember cheaper than Nova Micro?

Nova Micro is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Ember costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via meta. Nova Micro costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Ember and Nova Micro?

Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Ember and Nova Micro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.9 vs 1.9), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.03/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Ember and Nova Micro?

Muse Ember is developed by Meta and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons