The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Ember vs Nova Pro

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 11.7. Muse Ember is 7.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 11.7, ranking #47 overall.

On price, Muse Ember is roughly 7.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 7.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Nova Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Ember
Meta
Nova Pro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.9
#47
11.7
#299
Reasoning
48.1
#24
11.3
#294
Coding
27.3
#86
10.0
#203
Agents
31.6
#45
10.0
#154
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Ember
Nova Pro
Vision
23.4#78
5.4#182
Multimodal
23.6#74
8.1#154
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Muse Ember · 27 for Nova Pro

No common benchmarks found

Muse Ember and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Ember costs less

For input processing, Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens) is 6.4x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Muse Ember.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Ember
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerMeta
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Pro's 300,000 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Nova Pro is limited to 300,000 tokens.

Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Ember and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Muse Ember is 24 months newer than Nova Pro.

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

2.0yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Muse Ember

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Ember and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Ember
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Ember vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Muse Ember or Nova Pro?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 11.7. Muse Ember is made by Meta and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Ember compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Muse Ember cheaper than Nova Pro?

Muse Ember is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Ember costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via meta. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Ember and Nova Pro?

Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Ember and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.9 vs 11.7), context window (1.0M vs 300K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Ember and Nova Pro?

Muse Ember is developed by Meta and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons