Muse Ember vs o1-preview
Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 15.9. Muse Ember is 131.3x cheaper per token.
Meta · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 15.9, ranking #47 overall.
On price, Muse Ember is roughly 131.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Ember also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Muse Ember
- overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 131.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose o1-preview
- you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Muse Ember · 8 for o1-preview
Muse Ember and o1-previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens) is 150.0x cheaper than o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens) is 120.0x cheaper than o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Muse Ember.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Ember accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to o1-preview's 128,000 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Muse Ember supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-preview does not.
Muse Ember can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Muse Ember
o1-preview
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09, while o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12.
Muse Ember is 26 months newer than o1-preview.
Nov 9, 2026
3 days ago
2.2yr newerSep 12, 2024
2.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API. o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure.
Muse Ember
o1-preview
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Muse Ember and o1-preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Muse Ember vs o1-preview.