The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Glimmer-30B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 21.8.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 21.8, ranking #106 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Glimmer-30B wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.2 and ranks #106 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 9 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.2
#106
21.8
#203
Reasoning
34.7
#104
19.6
#216
Coding
22.5
#99
2.8
#244
Agents
17.3
#96
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 9
1 of 9
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Glimmer-30B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
28.4#100
12.1#246
Tool use
19.8#72
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Muse Glimmer-30B · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

9 shared

Muse Glimmer-30B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AA-LCR, GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SciCode, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (IFBench).

Muse Glimmer-30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.6B diff

Muse Glimmer-30B has 25.6B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 640.0% larger.

Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
29.6Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
29.6B
Muse Glimmer-30B
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Glimmer-30B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Muse Glimmer-30B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Glimmer-30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Glimmer-30B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Glimmer-30B
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Glimmer-30B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Muse Glimmer-30B or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Muse Glimmer-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 35.2 to 21.8. Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Glimmer-30B compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, Tau2 Telecom: 94.1%, PinchBench: 90.5%, Tau2 Retail: 87.1%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Glimmer-30B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Glimmer-30B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.2 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Glimmer-30B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons