Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs MAI-Code-1-FlashWhich is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs MAI-Code-1-Flash — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and MAI-Code-1-Flash (by Microsoft) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose MAI-Code-1-Flash if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro), while MAI-Code-1-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Code-1-Flash does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 18.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (61.5% vs 51.2%)
Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and MAI-Code-1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs MAI-Code-1-Flash.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to MAI-Code-1-Flash in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and MAI-Code-1-Flash?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons