The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.3 vs o3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 31.1. Muse Spark 1.3 is 28.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 31.1, ranking #5 overall.

On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 28.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 28.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o3

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.3
#5
31.1
#105
52.8
#7
30.8
#108
41.7
#10
15.3
#122
40.4
#4
4.6
#145
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.10 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Muse Spark 1.3
o3
35.5#2
11.9#105
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Muse Spark 1.3 · 22 for o3

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.3 and o3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 20.0x cheaper than o3 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 40.0x cheaper than o3 ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
OpenAI
o3
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to o3's 200,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while o3 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark 1.3 and o3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 17 months newer than o3.

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.

Muse Spark 1.3

o3

May 2024

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API. o3 is available from OpenAI.

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

o3

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.3 and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.3
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.3 vs o3.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.3 or o3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 31.1. Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark 1.3 compare to o3 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper than o3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is 20.0x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta. o3 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.3 and o3?

Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.3 and o3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.3 vs 31.1), context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $2.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.3 and o3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta and o3 is developed by OpenAI.