The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs o3

o3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.8 to 22.1.

NVIDIA · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 30.8 to 22.1, ranking #135 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o3 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 30.8 and ranks #135 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
o3
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
22.1
#202
30.8
#135
Reasoning
19.8
#213
30.5
#137
Coding
2.9
#241
14.8
#150
Agents
-0.7
#198
3.8
#181
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
—
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
o3
Math
12.2#245
25.4#115
Tool use
-2.1#205
10.7#137
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) · 22 for o3

3 shared

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o3 is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified).

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while o3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 18 months newer than o3.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1.5yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs o3.

Which is better, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) or o3?

o3 leads the LLM Stats Score 30.8 to 22.1. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) compare to o3 in benchmarks?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and o3?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and o3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (22.1 vs 30.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and o3?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA and o3 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons