The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 42.7.

Meta · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 42.7, ranking #22 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo

  • you are already invested in the ByteDance ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder
Meta
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
49.7
#22
42.7
#59
Reasoning
42.4
#57
44.2
#45
Coding
39.5
#12
29.6
#62
Agents
37.6
#14
28.5
#55
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Muse Wonder
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Vision
26.6#52
30.4#38
Tool use
22.4#54
19.6#70
Multimodal
26.6#52
33.0#21
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Muse Wonder · 90 for Seed 2.1 Turbo

1 shared

Muse Wonder outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Program Bench), while Seed 2.1 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Wonder specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and Seed 2.1 Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while Seed 2.1 Turbo was released on 2026-06-24.

Muse Wonder is 4 months newer than Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
Seed 2.1 Turbo

Jun 24, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Seed 2.1 Turbo side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 42.7. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Seed 2.1 Turbo is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Seed 2.1 Turbo in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Seed 2.1 Turbo scores CharXiv-D: 94.6%, MathVision: 92.7%, MathVista: 90.5%, MathVerse: 89.2%, Video-MME: 89.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.1 Turbo supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.7 vs 42.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and Seed 2.1 Turbo is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons