The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Nova Pro

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 12.2. Nova Pro is 5.7x cheaper per token.

Meta · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 12.2, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Nova Pro is roughly 5.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nova Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 5.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder
Meta
Nova Pro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.9
#29
12.2
#268
Reasoning
33.1
#108
12.0
#263
Coding
38.9
#18
10.1
#179
Agents
34.1
#24
10.2
#131
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Wonder
Nova Pro
Vision
25.4#53
5.5#162
Multimodal
25.4#52
8.3#139
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 27 for Nova Pro

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Pro costs less

For input processing, Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Nova Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Pro's 300,000 tokens. Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Muse Wonder is 23 months newer than Nova Pro.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 days ago

1.9yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Nova Pro?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 12.2. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Muse Wonder cheaper than Nova Pro?

Nova Pro is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Nova Pro?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.9 vs 12.2), context window (1.0M vs 300K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and Nova Pro?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons