The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs o1-pro

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.7.

Meta · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.7, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose o1-pro

  • you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.9
#29
19.7
#215
33.1
#109
20.0
#206
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 2 for o1-pro

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder and o1-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Wonder specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o1-pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and o1-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

Muse Wonder is 22 months newer than o1-pro.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 days ago

1.8yr newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Muse Wonder

—

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
o1-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs o1-pro.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or o1-pro?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.7. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and o1-pro?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and o1-pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and o1-pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.9 vs 19.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and o1-pro?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.