The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Pixtral Large

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 11.8. Pixtral Large is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Meta · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 11.8, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Pixtral Large is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Pixtral Large

  • cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder
Meta
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.9
#29
11.8
#272
Reasoning
33.1
#108
13.1
#256
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Wonder
Pixtral Large
Vision
25.4#52
10.9#126
Multimodal
25.4#52
13.2#113
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 7 for Pixtral Large

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder and Pixtral Largedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Pixtral Large costs less

For input processing, Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Pixtral Large ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Pixtral Large ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Pixtral Large.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Pixtral Large's 128,000 tokens. Only Pixtral Large specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and Pixtral Large support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Wonder is licensed under a proprietary license, while Pixtral Large uses Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Pixtral Large

Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while Pixtral Large was released on 2024-11-18.

Muse Wonder is 23 months newer than Pixtral Large.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

0 days ago

1.9yr newer
Pixtral Large

Nov 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API. Pixtral Large is available from Mistral AI.

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Pixtral Large

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Pixtral Large side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Pixtral Large
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Pixtral Large.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Pixtral Large?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 11.8. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Pixtral Large is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Pixtral Large in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Pixtral Large scores AI2D: 93.8%, DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 88.1%, VQAv2: 80.9%, MM-MT-Bench: 74.0%.

Is Muse Wonder cheaper than Pixtral Large?

Pixtral Large is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta. Pixtral Large costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Pixtral Large?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and Pixtral Large supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Pixtral Large?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.9 vs 11.8), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $2.00/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and Pixtral Large?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and Pixtral Large is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons