The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Solar Pro 4

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 35.0. Solar Pro 4 is 15.2x cheaper per token.

Meta · Upstage · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 35.0, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 15.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Solar Pro 4

  • cost matters — it's about 15.2x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder
Meta
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.9
#29
35.0
#102
Reasoning
33.1
#109
34.6
#96
Coding
38.9
#18
20.8
#104
Agents
34.1
#24
11.4
#123
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$4.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
524,288

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 9 for Solar Pro 4

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder and Solar Pro 4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Solar Pro 4 costs less

For input processing, Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Only Solar Pro 4 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input524,288 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas Solar Pro 4 does not.

Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Solar Pro 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Solar Pro 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.

Muse Wonder is 2 months newer than Solar Pro 4.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer
Solar Pro 4

Aug 6, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Solar Pro 4

upstage logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Solar Pro 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Solar Pro 4.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Solar Pro 4?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 35.0. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Solar Pro 4 is made by Upstage. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Solar Pro 4 in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Solar Pro 4 scores AIME 2026: 95.3%, GPQA: 89.0%, LiveCodeBench: 87.8%, MMLU-Pro: 86.3%, AA-LCR: 71.0%.

Is Muse Wonder cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta. Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via upstage.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Solar Pro 4?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Solar Pro 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.9 vs 35.0), context window (1.0M vs 524K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and Solar Pro 4?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage.

Related comparisons