The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Phi 4

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 5.1.

NVIDIA · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 5.1, ranking #142 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #142 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Phi 4
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#142
5.1
#320
Reasoning
29.2
#143
6.2
#311
Coding
14.8
#151
3.3
#238
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
—
16,384

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Phi 4
Math
23.6#135
12.8#241
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) · 13 for Phi 4

1 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

59.3B diff

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has 59.3B more parameters than Phi 4, making it 403.4% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
14.7B
Phi 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,384 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,384 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 22 months newer than Phi 4.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.8yr newer
Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Phi 4 has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has more recent training data (up to 2026-05-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 (2024-06-01).

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

1.9 yr newer
Phi 4

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
✓ Preferred
Phi 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Phi 4.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) or Phi 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 5.1. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Phi 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Phi 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 5.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Phi 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons