Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 23.2.
NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 23.2, ranking #146 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.6 and ranks #146 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
- you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
10 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) · 47 for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has 41.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 124.2% larger.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 13 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.
Oct 15, 2026
5 days ago
1.1yr newerSep 22, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.
May 2026
—
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.
Related comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open