The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs QwQ-32B-Preview

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 8.5.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 8.5, ranking #203 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.8 and ranks #203 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QwQ-32B-Preview

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
21.8
#203
8.5
#299
Reasoning
19.6
#216
8.8
#289
Coding
2.8
#244
4.3
#229
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
32,768

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
QwQ-32B-Preview
Math
12.1#246
8.8#268
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) · 4 for QwQ-32B-Preview

1 shared

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

28.5B diff

QwQ-32B-Preview has 28.5B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 712.5% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
32.5Bparameters
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
32.5B
QwQ-32B-Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 23 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

1.9yr newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and QwQ-32B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs QwQ-32B-Preview.

Which is better, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) or QwQ-32B-Preview?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 8.5. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) compare to QwQ-32B-Preview in benchmarks?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.8 vs 8.5), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons