Model Comparison

Nova Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Nova Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Nova Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-C, BBH, HumanEval, MMLU), while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, MATH).

Nova Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

Nova Pro

Input300,000 tokens

Output300,000 tokens

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nova Pro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Nova Pro is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.5 years ago

2mo newer

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Nova Pro

View details

Amazon

Larger context window (300,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher ARC-C score (94.8% vs 70.4%)

Higher BBH score (86.9% vs 84.5%)

Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 88.4%)

Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 83.3%)

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Higher GPQA score (49.5% vs 46.9%)

Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 94.8%)

Higher MATH score (83.1% vs 76.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Nova Pro	Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Nova Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nova Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Nova Pro is made by Amazon and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nova Pro compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nova Pro supports 300K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nova Pro is developed by Amazon and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.