Nova Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Nova Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B are closely matched at 12.4 and 15.7 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3 235B A22B is 14.0x cheaper per token.
Amazon · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nova Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 12.4 and 15.7.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 235B A22B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 235B A22B is roughly 14.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Nova Pro also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nova Pro
- you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 14.0x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
27 reported for Nova Pro · 23 for Qwen3 235B A22B
Nova Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MATH), while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 4 benchmarks (BBH, BFCL, GPQA, MMLU).
Qwen3 235B A22B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens) is 32.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 128,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Qwen3 235B A22B is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 235B A22B does not.
Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Nova Pro
Qwen3 235B A22B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nova Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.
Qwen3 235B A22B is 5 months newer than Nova Pro.
Nov 20, 2024
1.8 years ago
Apr 29, 2025
1.4 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Nova Pro is available from Bedrock. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.
Nova Pro
Qwen3 235B A22B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nova Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nova Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B.