The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking are closely matched at 18.4 and 23.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 18.4 and 23.6.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
18.4
#212
23.6
#175
17.2
#211
24.7
#155
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
16.4#205
25.4#111
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Nemotron Nano 9B v2 · 47 for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

3 shared

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

24.1B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has 24.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 270.8% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 1 month newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking's cutoff date.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 18.4 and 23.6. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron Nano 9B v2 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (18.4 vs 23.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.