Model Comparison

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 8B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking — which is better?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (by NVIDIA) and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA). Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2 if…

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Jun 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

100.0M diff

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has 0.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 1.1% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
9.0Bparameters
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
9.0B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Fri Jun 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 1 month newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

10 months ago

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's cutoff date.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher IFEval score (90.3% vs 83.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (80.3% vs 72.1%)
Higher GPQA score (69.9% vs 64.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nemotron Nano 9B v2 compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.