Model Comparison
o1-preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 53.8x cheaper per token.
Verdict: o1-preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking — which is better?
o1-preview (by OpenAI) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
o1-preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is roughly 53.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
o1-preview also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose o1-preview if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 53.8x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
o1-preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens) is 40.0x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
o1-preview accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 12 months newer than o1-preview.
Sep 12, 2024
1.8 years ago
Sep 10, 2025
9 months ago
12mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.
o1-preview
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
o1-preview
View detailsOpenAI
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about o1-preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.