o3-mini vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
o3-mini leads the LLM Stats Score 21.5 to 16.5. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 5.9x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
o3-mini leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.5 to 16.5, ranking #178 overall.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o3-mini wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 5.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
o3-mini also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose o3-mini
- overall performance matters — it scores 21.5 and ranks #178 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 5.9x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
25 reported for o3-mini · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
o3-mini outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU, Multi-IF), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA).
o3-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, o3-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 5.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, o3-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).
In conclusion, o3-mini is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
o3-mini accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. o3-mini can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas o3-mini does not.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
o3-mini
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
o3-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 8 months newer than o3-mini.
Jan 30, 2025
1.6 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
11 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.
Sep 2023
—
Provider Availability
o3-mini is available from Azure, OpenAI. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
o3-mini
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against o3-mini and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about o3-mini vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.