The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o3-mini

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.5.

Xiaomi · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.5, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o3-mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.7
#29
21.5
#190
43.2
#42
20.6
#188
36.6
#22
5.1
#206
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$1.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
o3-mini
28.1#22
-0.0#182
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 25 for o3-mini

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o3-minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3-mini specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3-mini specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas o3-mini does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while o3-mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

o3-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 20 months newer than o3-mini.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.6yr newer
o3-mini

Jan 30, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

o3-mini

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o3-mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
o3-mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o3-mini.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o3-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.5. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and o3-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to o3-mini in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. o3-mini scores COLLIE: 98.7%, MATH: 97.9%, IFEval: 93.9%, MGSM: 92.0%, AIME 2024: 87.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o3-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and o3-mini supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o3-mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 21.5), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o3-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and o3-mini is developed by OpenAI.