Model Comparison

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct — which is better?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

176.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has 176.0B more parameters than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct, making it 293.3% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
236.0Bparameters
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 13 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (88.8% vs 78.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (81.8% vs 45.3%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.