The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 24.7. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 2.3x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 24.7, ranking #123 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #123 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
29.9
#123
24.7
#161
Reasoning
25.9
#148
22.5
#169
Agents
15.5
#83
12.7
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
$0.88 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Vision
19.5#73
17.9#81
Multimodal
21.9#61
20.6#65
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · 50 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

1 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CharXiv-R), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.88/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.88
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 10 months newer than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 months ago

10mo newer
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 24.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.88/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (29.9 vs 24.7), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons