The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched at 2.8 and 6.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 2.8 and 6.5.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 8 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.8
#312
6.5
#292
-0.2
#320
3.0
#303
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 8
6 of 8
Input price
$0.05 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
1.6#172
4.3#159
3.6#141
6.5#132
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

8 shared

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MMBench, MMMU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MMMU, OCRBench, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.7B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has 2.7B more parameters than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, making it 48.0% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
5.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
5.6B
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 0 month newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

6d newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 2.8 and 6.5. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi-4-multimodal-instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct scores ScienceQA Visual: 97.5%, DocVQA: 93.2%, MMBench: 86.7%, POPE: 85.6%, OCRBench: 84.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.8 vs 6.5), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.