Model Comparison

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct — which is better?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MMBench, MMMU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MMMU, OCRBench, TextVQA). Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 8 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MMBench, MMMU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, InfoVQA, MMMU, OCRBench, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.7B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has 2.7B more parameters than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, making it 48.0% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
5.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
5.6B
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 0 month newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Feb 1, 2025

1.5 years ago

6d newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct's cutoff date.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher MMBench score (86.7% vs 84.3%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (38.5% vs 38.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher ChartQA score (87.3% vs 81.4%)
Higher DocVQA score (95.7% vs 93.2%)
Higher InfoVQA score (82.6% vs 72.7%)
Higher MMMU score (58.6% vs 55.1%)
Higher OCRBench score (86.4% vs 84.4%)
Higher TextVQA score (84.9% vs 75.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-4-multimodal-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-4-multimodal-instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct scores ScienceQA Visual: 97.5%, DocVQA: 93.2%, MMBench: 86.7%, POPE: 85.6%, OCRBench: 84.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-4-multimodal-instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.