Model Comparison

Pixtral-12B vs Qwen3 32BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Pixtral-12B and Qwen3 32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Pixtral-12B vs Qwen3 32B — which is better?

Pixtral-12B (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 32B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Pixtral-12B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output

Choose Qwen3 32B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Pixtral-12B and Qwen3 32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Pixtral-12B costs less

For input processing, Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Pixtral-12B ($0.15/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 32B is more expensive than Pixtral-12B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerMistral
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

20.4B diff

Qwen3 32B has 20.4B more parameters than Pixtral-12B, making it 164.5% larger.

Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
12.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
12.4B
Pixtral-12B
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Pixtral-12B is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Pixtral-12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 32B is 7 months newer than Pixtral-12B.

Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.2 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Pixtral-12B is available from Mistral AI. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Pixtral-12B

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Pixtral-12B vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Pixtral-12B or Qwen3 32B?

Pixtral-12B (Mistral AI) and Qwen3 32B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Pixtral-12B compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is Pixtral-12B cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Pixtral-12B costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via mistral. Qwen3 32B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Pixtral-12B and Qwen3 32B?

Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Pixtral-12B and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Pixtral-12B and Qwen3 32B?

Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.