Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

16.3B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has 16.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 110.9% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
31.0Bparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (74.4% vs 45.5%)
Higher MMLU score (87.6% vs 79.7%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (80.5% vs 63.7%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (90.9% vs 80.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.