The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.7 to 6.5.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.7 to 6.5, ranking #250 overall.

In the 25 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct wins 24; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.7 and ranks #250 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 24 of 25 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
12.7
#250
6.5
#292
12.8
#241
3.0
#302
4.6
#152
-3.2
#178
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
24 of 25
1 of 25
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
7.6#263
3.2#288
9.2#130
4.3#159
9.5#78
0.5#111
12.1#106
6.5#132
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

30 reported for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

25 shared

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct outperforms in 24 benchmarks (AITZ_EM, Android Control High_EM, Android Control Low_EM, AndroidWorld_SR, CC-OCR, ChartQA, DocVQA, Hallusion Bench, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMBench, MMBench-Video, MMMU, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MMVet, MVBench, OCRBench, PerceptionTest, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, TempCompass, VideoMME w/o sub.), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MobileMiniWob++_SR).

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

63.7B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 63.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 768.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is licensed under tongyi-qianwen, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-01-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.7 to 6.5. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (12.7 vs 6.5), licensing (tongyi-qianwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.