Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OCRBench), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 14 benchmarks (AI2D, AndroidWorld_SR, Hallusion Bench, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MVBench, OCRBench-V2 (en), OSWorld, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMME w/o sub.). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 14 of 15 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

15 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OCRBench), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 14 benchmarks (AI2D, AndroidWorld_SR, Hallusion Bench, LVBench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, MVBench, OCRBench-V2 (en), OSWorld, ScreenSpot, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMME w/o sub.).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

39.0B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 39.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 118.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is licensed under tongyi-qianwen, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher OCRBench score (88.5% vs 85.5%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AI2D score (88.9% vs 88.4%)
Higher AndroidWorld_SR score (63.7% vs 35.0%)
Higher Hallusion Bench score (67.4% vs 55.2%)
Higher LVBench score (62.6% vs 47.3%)
Higher MathVision score (70.2% vs 38.1%)
Higher MathVista-Mini score (85.9% vs 74.8%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (68.1% vs 51.1%)
Higher MMStar score (79.4% vs 70.8%)
Higher MVBench score (73.2% vs 70.4%)
Higher OCRBench-V2 (en) score (68.4% vs 61.5%)
Higher OSWorld score (41.0% vs 8.8%)
Higher ScreenSpot score (95.7% vs 87.1%)
Higher ScreenSpot Pro score (57.1% vs 43.6%)
Higher VideoMME w/o sub. score (77.3% vs 73.3%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (tongyi-qianwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.