The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 18.7 and 20.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 18.7 and 20.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3 32B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
18.7
#197
20.5
#181
18.9
#191
19.4
#186
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
21.3#140
19.7#155
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Qwen3 32B · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

Qwen3 32B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

200.0M diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 0.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 0.6% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
32.8B
Qwen3 32B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 5 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3 32B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen3 32B or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 18.7 and 20.5. Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3 32B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3 32B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (18.7 vs 20.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.