The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen3 32B

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 18.2. Qwen3 32B is 3.1x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 18.2, ranking #108 overall.

On price, Qwen3 32B is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3 32B

  • cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
35.0
#108
18.2
#235
36.2
#94
18.4
#230
21.0
#108
8.8
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
262,144
40,960

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Qwen3 32B
28.1#101
21.2#158
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) · 9 for Qwen3 32B

No common benchmarks found

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3 32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Qwen3 32B ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is more expensive than Qwen3 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

87.2B diff

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 87.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 265.9% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
120.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Qwen3 32B's 40,960 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3 32B is limited to 40,960 tokens.

NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input40,960 tokens
Output40,960 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 32B does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 18 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.5yr newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3 32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) or Qwen3 32B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 18.2. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) cheaper than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 32B costs $0.08/M input and $0.28/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3 32B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 41K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.0 vs 18.2), context window (262K vs 41K), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.08/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) and Qwen3 32B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.