The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 21.1 and 20.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 21.1 and 20.3.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
21.1
#195
20.3
#201
Reasoning
21.1
#188
19.2
#207
Agents
5.3
#152
9.5
#128
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Writing
17.6#32
11.4#67
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (BFCL-v3).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

447.0B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 447.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, making it 1354.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 8 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 21.1 and 20.3. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.1 vs 20.3), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons