Model Comparison
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (BFCL-v3).
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 447.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 1354.5% larger.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 8 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.
Jan 31, 2025
1.2 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
7 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking