Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 10.7. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 2.1x cheaper per token.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.1 to 10.7, ranking #192 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
- overall performance matters — it scores 21.1 and ranks #192 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
10 reported for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct · 45 for Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL-v3), while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 476.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct, making it 11900.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 8 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.
Jan 31, 2025
1.6 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
1.0 years ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.