The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-bench Multilingual). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jan 2025
Aug 2026
License
Apache 2.0
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-bench Multilingual).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

355.0B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 355.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 284.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 19 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.